* Inserting modules w/o version check
@ 2002-04-09 16:37 Mathew, Tisson K
2002-04-09 16:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mathew, Tisson K @ 2002-04-09 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
All ,
Can we enforce no version check for modules when they are inserted ( insmod
) ? If yes , can this be implemented in the module itself ?
Thanks in advance
-tm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Inserting modules w/o version check
2002-04-09 16:37 Inserting modules w/o version check Mathew, Tisson K
@ 2002-04-09 16:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-09 17:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-04-10 6:53 ` Keith Owens
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard B. Johnson @ 2002-04-09 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathew, Tisson K; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mathew, Tisson K wrote:
> All ,
>
> Can we enforce no version check for modules when they are inserted
> ( insmod
insmod -f module.o
|_______________ force loading
> ) ? If yes , can this be implemented in the module itself ?
>
No. `insmod` wouldn't load it so the module doesn't get a chance to
"check" anything.
> Thanks in advance
Also, note that `struct file_operations` has different member-
locations for different kernel versions. Even if the module
loaded, you might end up with 'read' being 'seek', etc. Bad idea.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Windows-2000/Professional isn't.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Inserting modules w/o version check
@ 2002-04-09 17:00 Mathew, Tisson K
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mathew, Tisson K @ 2002-04-09 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'root@chaos.analogic.com'; +Cc: linux-kernel
Thanks Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard B. Johnson [mailto:root@chaos.analogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Mathew, Tisson K
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Inserting modules w/o version check
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Mathew, Tisson K wrote:
> All ,
>
> Can we enforce no version check for modules when they are inserted (
> insmod
insmod -f module.o
|_______________ force loading
> ) ? If yes , can this be implemented in the module itself ?
>
No. `insmod` wouldn't load it so the module doesn't get a chance to "check"
anything.
> Thanks in advance
Also, note that `struct file_operations` has different member- locations for
different kernel versions. Even if the module loaded, you might end up with
'read' being 'seek', etc. Bad idea.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Windows-2000/Professional isn't.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Inserting modules w/o version check
2002-04-09 16:37 Inserting modules w/o version check Mathew, Tisson K
2002-04-09 16:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
@ 2002-04-09 17:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-04-10 6:53 ` Keith Owens
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2002-04-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathew, Tisson K, linux-kernel
"Mathew, Tisson K" wrote:
>
> All ,
>
> Can we enforce no version check for modules when they are inserted ( insmod
insmod -f
> ) ? If yes , can this be implemented in the module itself ?
no
but it's much nicer to make a "lazy compile" option so that if the
kernel
doesn't match you compile a new module from source on demand....
It's not hard to do...
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Inserting modules w/o version check
2002-04-09 16:37 Inserting modules w/o version check Mathew, Tisson K
2002-04-09 16:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-09 17:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2002-04-10 6:53 ` Keith Owens
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keith Owens @ 2002-04-10 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mathew, Tisson K; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 09:37:14 -0700 ,
"Mathew, Tisson K" <tisson.k.mathew@intel.com> wrote:
>Can we enforce no version check for modules when they are inserted ( insmod
>) ? If yes , can this be implemented in the module itself ?
insmod -f, but don't bother sending bug reports to l-k after a forced
insert.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-10 6:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-09 16:37 Inserting modules w/o version check Mathew, Tisson K
2002-04-09 16:48 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-09 17:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-04-10 6:53 ` Keith Owens
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09 17:00 Mathew, Tisson K
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox