From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:44:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB4B248.2807558D@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CB4203D.C3BE7298@zip.com.au> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0204100725410.15110-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu> <3CB48F8A.DF534834@zip.com.au> <20020410221211.GA6076@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu>
Jan Harkes wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:16:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I believe that the object relationship you're describing is
> > that the inode->i_mapping points to the main address_space,
> > and the `host' field of both the main and private address_spaces
> > both point at the same inode? That the inode owns two
> > address_spaces?
>
> Actually with Coda we've got 2 inodes that have an identical i_mapping.
> The Coda inode's i_mapping is set to point to the hosting inode's
> i_data.
I see. So this is all your fault :)
> ...
>
> But Coda has 2 inodes, which one are you connecting to whose superblock.
> My guess is that it would be correct to add inode->i_mapping->host to
> inode->i_mapping->host->i_sb, which will be the underlying inode in
> Coda's case, but host isn't guaranteed to be an inode, it just happens
> to be an inode in all existing situations.
When a page is marked dirty, the path which is followed
is page->mapping->host->i_sb. So in this case the page will
be attached to its page->mapping.dirty_pages, and
page->mapping->host will be attached to page->mapping->host->i_sb.s_dirty
This is as it always was - I didn't change any of this.
> > > What's more, I wonder how well does your scheme work with ->i_mapping
> > > to a different inode's ->i_data (CODA et.al., file access to block devices).
> >
> > Presumably, those different inodes have a superblock? In that
> > case set_page_dirty will mark that inode dirty wrt its own
> > superblock. set_page_dirty() is currently an optional a_op,
> > but it's not obvious that there will be a need for that.
>
> Coda's inodes don't have to get dirtied because we never write them out,
> although the associated dirty pages do need to hit the disk eventually :)
>
Right. Presumably, the pages hit the disk via the hosting inode's
filesystem's mechanics.
And it remains the case that Coda inodes will not be marked DIRTY_PAGES
because set_page_dirty()'s page->mapping->host walk will arrive at
the hosting inode.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-10 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-10 11:21 [prepatch] address_space-based writeback Andrew Morton
2002-04-10 11:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-10 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-10 20:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-10 22:12 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-10 21:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-04-10 22:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-10 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-11 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-11 20:41 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-11 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-11 22:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-11 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-12 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-11 23:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-11 23:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-12 4:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-12 1:15 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-12 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-12 7:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-27 15:53 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-28 3:03 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 9:03 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-29 11:11 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 11:59 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-29 12:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-30 17:19 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-30 13:15 ` john slee
2002-04-30 13:24 ` Billy O'Connor
2002-04-30 13:36 ` jlnance
2002-04-30 13:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-01 19:18 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-02 8:49 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-03 15:35 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 12:49 ` Helge Hafting
2002-05-03 22:47 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 21:50 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-05 0:46 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 7:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-03 14:48 ` Rob Landley
2002-05-05 0:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-30 16:12 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-04-10 23:02 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-10 19:29 ` Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-10 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-15 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CB4B248.2807558D@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox