From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cus.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [prepatch] address_space-based writeback
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:03:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB6163B.EAC8F633@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CB5FFB5.693E7755@zip.com.au> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1020411235415.24708A-100000@virgo.cus.cam.ac.uk>
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>
> ...
> It would be great to be able to submit variable size "io entities" even
> greater than PAGE_CACHE_SIZE (by giving a list of pages, starting offset
> in first page and total request size for example) and saying write that to
> the device starting at offset xyz. That would suit ntfs perfectly. (-:
>
Yes, I'll be implementing that. Writeback will hit the filesystem
via a_ops->writeback_mapping(mapping, nr_pages). The filesytem
will then call in to generic_writeback_mapping(), which will walk
the pages, assemble BIOs and send them off.
The filesystem needs to pass a little state structure into the
generic writeback function. An important part of that is a
semaphore which is held while writeback is locking multiple
pages. To avoid ab/ba deadlocks.
The current implementation of this bio-assembler is for no-buffer
(delalloc) fileystems only. It need to be enhanced (or forked)
to also cope with buffer-backed pages. It will need to peek
inside the buffer-heads to detect clean buffers (maybe. It
definitely needs to skip unmapped ones). When such a buffer
is encountered the BIO will be sent off and a new one will be started.
The code for this is going to be quite horrendous. I suspect
the comment/code ratio will exceed 1.0, which is a bad sign :)
One thing upon which I am undecided: for syncalloc filesystems
like ext2, do we attach buffers at ->readpages() time, or do
we just leave the page bufferless?
That's a hard call. It helps the common case, but in the uncommon
case (we overwrite the file after reading it), we need to run
get_block again.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-12 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-10 11:21 [prepatch] address_space-based writeback Andrew Morton
2002-04-10 11:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-10 19:16 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-10 20:53 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-10 22:12 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-10 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-10 22:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-10 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-11 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-11 20:41 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-11 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-11 22:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-11 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-12 0:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-11 23:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-11 23:22 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-11 23:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-04-12 4:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-04-12 1:15 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-12 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-12 7:57 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-27 15:53 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-28 3:03 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 9:03 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-29 11:11 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 11:59 ` Nikita Danilov
2002-04-29 12:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-29 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-04-30 17:19 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-30 13:15 ` john slee
2002-04-30 13:24 ` Billy O'Connor
2002-04-30 13:36 ` jlnance
2002-04-30 13:40 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-01 19:18 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-02 8:49 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-03 15:35 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 12:49 ` Helge Hafting
2002-05-03 22:47 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 21:50 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-05 0:46 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-03 7:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-03 14:48 ` Rob Landley
2002-05-05 0:42 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-04-30 16:12 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-04-10 23:02 ` Jan Harkes
2002-04-10 19:29 ` Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-10 19:41 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-15 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CB6163B.EAC8F633@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=aia21@cus.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox