From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CBBD3AC.2080301@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204051657270.16281-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <3CBBCD31.4090105@evision-ventures.com> <20020416103001.A32435@ucw.cz>
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 09:05:21AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>Tue Apr 16 01:02:47 CEST 2002 ide-clean-36
>>
>>- Consolidate ide_choose_drive() and choose_drive() in to one function.
>>
>>- Remove sector data byteswpapping support. Byte-swapping the data is supported
>> on the file-system level where applicable. Byte-swapped interfaces are
>> supported on a lower level anyway. And finally it was used inconsistently.
>
>
> Are you sure about this? I think file systems support LE/BE, but not
> byteswapping because of IDE being LE on a BE system.
I'm sure about this. For the following reasons:
1. The removed functionality affected only sector data transfers.
2. The following code for interfaces with byte swapped BUS setups
still remains intact:
#if defined(CONFIG_ATARI) || defined(CONFIG_Q40)
if (MACH_IS_ATARI || MACH_IS_Q40) {
/* Atari has a byte-swapped IDE interface */
insw_swapw(IDE_DATA_REG, buffer, bytecount / 2);
return;
}
#endif
And indeed as you show - there was confusion about this issue
throughout the whole driver, since the taskfile_in(out)
functions where basically just the byteswapped variants and
where not uses consistently.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-16 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-06 1:01 Linux 2.5.8-pre2 Linus Torvalds
2002-04-06 6:59 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-07 10:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:27 ` Russell King
2002-04-07 10:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:56 ` Russell King
2002-04-07 13:34 ` Russell King
2002-04-07 14:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:50 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-09 8:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre2 IDE 29b Martin Dalecki
2002-04-10 13:14 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 30 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-10 13:16 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 31 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-11 13:42 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 32 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-14 13:55 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 33 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-15 13:45 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 35 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 7:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 8:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 7:33 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-04-16 8:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 9:19 ` David Lang
2002-04-16 8:43 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 14:14 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-16 13:49 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 15:24 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 15:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 16:33 ` Padraig Brady
2002-04-16 17:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-16 17:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 17:04 ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:00 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 17:09 ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 17:16 ` David Lang
2002-04-17 7:44 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 9:33 ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-04-17 7:46 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 9:26 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-17 9:39 ` David Lang
2002-04-17 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-17 9:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-17 1:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-04-17 8:39 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 8:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-16 15:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 15:58 ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-16 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-17 7:38 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 15:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 15:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 17:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-18 20:33 ` eNBD on loopback [was Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36] Pavel Machek
2002-04-18 20:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-18 10:45 ` regarding NFS Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19 9:36 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19 1:19 ` Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19 12:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19 2:26 ` Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19 13:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-17 7:36 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 9:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 22:46 ` Brian Gerst
2002-04-17 7:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 9:22 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 37 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18 9:14 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 38 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18 10:48 ` Russell King
2002-04-18 9:54 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18 9:16 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 37 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18 9:22 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 39 Martin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-16 9:09 [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 Norbert Kiesel
2002-04-16 8:21 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 10:06 ` Norbert Kiesel
2002-04-16 9:20 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 10:20 ` Norbert Kiesel
2002-04-17 10:10 Petr Vandrovec
2002-04-17 10:20 ` David Lang
2002-04-19 17:17 Peter T. Breuer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CBBD3AC.2080301@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox