From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: andersen@codepoet.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.8 IDE oops (TCQ breakage?)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:28:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CBD7889.6060707@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204161749.TAA16333@harpo.it.uu.se> <3CBD45BD.4040209@evision-ventures.com> <20020417120817.GA800@suse.de> <20020417122502.GB800@suse.de> <3CBD5D93.30501@evision-ventures.com> <20020417141653.GA13627@codepoet.org>
Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Wed Apr 17, 2002 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>Yes I see. However for now I will just concentrate on ide-cd.c and
>>await you to merge up with IDE 37 OK? (It should be easy this time :-).
>
>
> While working on ide-cd, I think the bad sector handling needs
> serious attention... For example, I have a CD-ROM (a toddler
> game for windoz) that my 2 year old son scratched into
> non-functional oblivion. I attempted to extract the contents in
> the hope of burning it to a new CD. Using dd conv=noerror, it
> began ripping the content just fine -- till it hit the bad spot.
> Then it took like 12 hours to progress by an additional 10 MB...
>
> Looking at the ide-cd code (since I used to maintain it years
> ago) it seems that on a bad sector, ide-cd retries ERROR_MAX (8)
> times. But the low level ide driver is _also_ doing ERROR_MAX
> retries for each of those 8 retries from ide-cd.... Do we
> really need to retry 64 times when the drive told us clearly the
> _first_ time that it is an uncorrectable medium error?
>
> Perhaps something like this patch would make more sense? With
> this patch is place, error handling is still awful, but at least
> a dd was able to make a bit of progress....
Yeep you are entierly right. I will include your patch directly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-17 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-16 17:49 2.5.8 IDE oops (TCQ breakage?) Mikael Pettersson
2002-04-16 18:07 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 9:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 12:08 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 12:25 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 11:33 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 14:16 ` Erik Andersen
2002-04-17 13:28 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-17 20:02 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CBD7889.6060707@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox