public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: andersen@codepoet.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.8 IDE oops (TCQ breakage?)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 15:28:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CBD7889.6060707@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200204161749.TAA16333@harpo.it.uu.se> <3CBD45BD.4040209@evision-ventures.com> <20020417120817.GA800@suse.de> <20020417122502.GB800@suse.de> <3CBD5D93.30501@evision-ventures.com> <20020417141653.GA13627@codepoet.org>

Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Wed Apr 17, 2002 at 01:33:39PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
>>Yes I see. However for now I will just concentrate on ide-cd.c and
>>await you to merge up with IDE 37 OK? (It should be easy this time :-).
> 
> 
> While working on ide-cd, I think the bad sector handling needs
> serious attention...  For example, I have a CD-ROM (a toddler
> game for windoz) that my 2 year old son scratched into
> non-functional oblivion.  I attempted to extract the contents in
> the hope of burning it to a new CD.  Using dd conv=noerror, it
> began ripping the content just fine -- till it hit the bad spot.
> Then it took like 12 hours to progress by an additional 10 MB...
> 
> Looking at the ide-cd code (since I used to maintain it years
> ago) it seems that on a bad sector, ide-cd retries ERROR_MAX (8)
> times.  But the low level ide driver is _also_ doing ERROR_MAX
> retries for each of those 8 retries from ide-cd....   Do we
> really need to retry 64 times when the drive told us clearly the
> _first_ time that it is an uncorrectable medium error?  
> 
> Perhaps something like this patch would make more sense?  With
> this patch is place, error handling is still awful, but at least
> a dd was able to make a bit of progress....  

Yeep you are entierly right. I will include your patch directly.



  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-17 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-16 17:49 2.5.8 IDE oops (TCQ breakage?) Mikael Pettersson
2002-04-16 18:07 ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17  9:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 12:08   ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 12:25     ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 11:33       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17 12:42         ` Jens Axboe
2002-04-17 14:16         ` Erik Andersen
2002-04-17 13:28           ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-17 20:02 Mikael Pettersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CBD7889.6060707@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox