Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Ian Molton
2002-04-21T03:38:54Z

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:

> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

well, this raises an interesting point...

should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
not?

is this 'bitkeeper documentation', 'documentation about bitkeeper', or
'linux kernel documentation', or what?