Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-04-21T15:53:34Z

Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:28:36AM +0200, Jochen Friedrich escreveu:
> > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > > different?
> >
> > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
>
> So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet
> another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390

Don't know, tried to submit?

Just checked, Hercules is not a proprietary emulator, in fact it is licensed
under the QPL. http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/herclic.html

> mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home
> page...

> Developing kernel stuff on 390 without emulator can be much fun as host
> operators tend to get very pissed if the IPL ratio comes near to 1/min ;-)

<joke>
Another good question: does Linus cares about Linux S/390? ;)
</joke>

- Arnaldo