Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Rob Landley
2002-04-21T07:45:20Z

On Friday 19 April 2002 03:43 pm, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> If I objected to the inclusion of a piece of code licensed under
> Microsoft's 'shared source' license, whould you also say I was denying your
> freedom?

I'd say that in that case you'd have a legal basis for objecting: a license
conflict with a tarball full of GPL code.

is there a license on the distribution of the documentation in question that
presents a legal problem for it to be distributed together with GPL kernel
code?

Rob