Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

Jeff Garzik
2002-04-22T20:57:12Z

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:42:46PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin
> > > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
> > > > for Swansea:
> > > >
> > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
> > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> > > >
> > > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
> > >
> > > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
> > > held to that level, I would be satisfied.
> >
> > <chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a
> > pointless advertisement.
>
> You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs?

"that level" was assuming you were referring to the URL-free printk
advertisement I quoted above.

Jeff