Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

yodaiken
2002-04-21T13:42:41Z

On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 10:18:34AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>
> > > Huh? BK requires no more net access than you require when submitting
> > > a regular patch. You need to be connected to move the bits.
> >
> > Wrong. Many corporate firewalls allow email and http (both via proxy) and
> > reject any other traffic. CVS and BK are both unusable in this
> > environment.
>
> So you're telling me that what I've been doing over the
> last months really shouldn't have been possible ?

What he is telling you is that people whose business is hidden
behind corporate firewalls so that they can make money with proprietary
work, find it morally outrageous that other people don't give away all
their work.

--
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com