Re: BK, deltas, snapshots and fate of -pre...

Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22T20:42:18Z

On Monday 22 April 2002 22:18, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:05:25PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Monday 22 April 2002 19:52, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Should we remove all advertisements from the kernel? A Big Penguin
> > > would probably object to the removal of this printk advertisement
> > > for Swansea:
> > >
> > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4
> > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> > >
> > > If the answer is no, then you are targetting BitKeeper specifically...
> >
> > Excellent point. If the BitKeeper advertising in the kernel source were
> > held to that level, I would be satisfied.
>
> <chuckle> -- and if that occurred, _I_ would fight to remove it as a
> pointless advertisement.

You'd want to get rid of the url that points at your docs?

--
Daniel