Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-04-21T18:18:46Z

Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 11:11:52AM -0700, John Alvord escreveu:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> > > > We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> > > > different?
> > >
> > > The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
> > > essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
> >
> > So would Linus accept a document on how to run Linux/390 on hercules (yet
> > another proprietary emulator)? This also was a FAQ on the linux-390
> > mailing list until the documentation is available on the hercules home
> > page...
> <Puzzled> I thought hercules was an open source project... There are some
> prioriatery 390 emulators (UMX, Flex) but not hercules.

As I said, its QPLed, so non-proprietary but subject to flamefest, but lets
stick (not me, thanks) to the regular bk ones ;)

- Arnaldo