public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: locking in sync_old_buffers
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:23:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CC48D51.3050506@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CC47A27.4000803@us.ibm.com> <3CC489CE.19A91699@zip.com.au>

Andrew Morton wrote:
 > If you're going to do this, then the BKL should be acquired
 > in fs/super.c:write_super(), so the per-fs ->write_super
 > functions do not see changed external locking rules.
 >
 > Possibly, fs/inode.c:write_inode() needs the same treatment.
 > But Doc/filesystems/Locking says that lock_kernel() is not
 > held across ->write_inode so there should be no need to take
 > it on the kupdate path.
That sounds sane.  I was just fishing for information before I go do 
anything drastic.

 > That's for 2.4.  For 2.5, we'd like sync_old_buffers to just
 > go away.   Do you have time to test
 >http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.8/everything.patch.gz
Absolutely.  What else does it contain that I should watch out for?

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-22 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22 21:01 locking in sync_old_buffers Dave Hansen
2002-04-22 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-22 22:23   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2002-04-22 22:28     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-22 22:50       ` Andrew Morton
2002-04-23  1:31   ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-23 18:29     ` Dave Hansen
2002-04-22 22:25 ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CC48D51.3050506@us.ibm.com \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox