From: Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
To: Luigi Genoni <kernel@Expansa.sns.it>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: XFS in the main kernel
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:13:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CC65B35.686100AF@TeraPort.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204232330430.4925-100000@Expansa.sns.it>
Luigi Genoni wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
> > > Re: XFS in the main kernel
> > >
> > definitely. Unless XFS is in the mainline kernel (marked as
> > experimantal if necessary) it will not get good exposure.
>
> XFS needs 2.5, not 2.4, because of a lot of reasons.
> If I do remember well a strong obiection to XFS is that it introduces a
> kernel thread to emulate Irix behavious to talk with pagebuf (a la Irix),
> end to have an interface with VM and Block Device layer.
>
> This forces some vincles.
>
No problem with XFS going into 2.5 mainline, but not 2.4. But - is that
happening?
Martin
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-24 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 13:36 XFS in the main kernel Martin Knoblauch
2002-04-23 14:30 ` Stephen Lord
2002-04-23 15:47 ` Martin Knoblauch
2002-04-23 21:37 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-04-23 9:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-24 9:32 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-23 15:47 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-04-23 15:55 ` Martin Knoblauch
2002-04-23 21:43 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-04-23 9:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-24 7:13 ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2002-04-24 9:02 ` Luigi Genoni
[not found] <20020422234419.GQ2470@dstl.gov.uk>
2002-04-23 8:31 ` Tony Gale
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-22 15:10 Dan Yocum
2002-04-21 15:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-04-22 16:55 ` Wichert Akkerman
2002-04-22 22:19 ` Matthias Andree
2002-04-22 22:47 ` Chris Mason
2002-04-22 23:29 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-22 23:44 ` Wichert Akkerman
2002-04-23 0:43 ` Luigi Genoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CC65B35.686100AF@TeraPort.de \
--to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
--cc=kernel@Expansa.sns.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.knoblauch@TeraPort.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox