Re: [bk+patch] Let (WIP) be replaced with (EXPERIMENTAL)

[Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>]

Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:35:50PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
> 
>>Uz.ytkownik Vojtech Pavlik napisa?:
>>
>>>ChangeSet@1.571, 2002-04-28 14:22:33+02:00, vojtech@twilight.ucw.cz
>>>  This removes the CONFIG_IDEDMA_PCI_WIP option, replacing it with
>>>  the more common CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. It also adds a depencency
>>>  on $CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL where missing.
>>
>>
>>All fine and all will be taken. However please note that
>>I don't use BK and I don't intend too. My rejection of
>>it isn't based on any idiotic policy - I found it just ugly to
>>use and I was confused about the beta-alpha versions
>>offered on the web site - too much work in progress for my taste.
>>Finally I don't entrust source code to programmers who even don't know
>>the difference between TCP and UDP and use TCP becouse they don't know better.
> 
> 
> Ok - your decision. If you want, I'll omit the BK part of the patches.
> On the other hand, if you could just forward it to Linus as is (or let
> me send it to Linus after your confirmation), change comments won't get
> lost. 
> 
> 
>>I preferr a classical diff -urN ;-).
> 
> 
> It's included, anyway.

Yes but why the hell should I bother looking at some uu-encoded stuff?
Jet another reason I think BK is plain ugly.
Anyway. Please send the chipset parts to linus directly. They seem
fine. However the _WIP change is despite beeing correct, not complete
and I will prefer to do it myself. OK?