public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Knoblauch <Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de>
To: pashley@storm.ca,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The tainted message
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:36:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CCE577A.DD3D83FE@TeraPort.de> (raw)

> Re: The tainted message
> 
> 
> Christian Bornträger wrote:
> >
> > Ian Molton wrote:
> > > Warning: Module %s is not open source, and as such, loading it will make
> > > your kernel un-debuggable. Please do not submit bug reports from a kernel
> > > with this module loaded, as they will be useless, and likely ignored.
> 
> Warning: Source code for module %s is not publicly available. Problems
> with a kernel that has loaded this module can be debugged only by someone
> with access to the module source. Therefore, please submit any bug reports
> to the module supplier, not to the Linux kernel mailing list.
> -

 The one on top is IMHO better. The reason is that the wording of the
second one, although giving better explanation why it (may) make the
kernel undebuggable, implicitely suggests (to me as a nonative english
speaker) that the problem is caused by the non compatibly licensed
module. Which I venture is not true in a lot of cases.

 Also, in both messages it is stated that the source is not publicly
available. This is not obvious to me. The module may just lack an
explicitely stated license. Maybe just a case of not RTFMing the modules
documentation, or an old source that hasn't been touched since
introduction of the tainting stuff.

 So, I would prefer:

"Warning: Source code for module %s may not be publicly available.
Problems
with a kernel that has loaded this module can be debugged only by
someone
with access to the module source. Therefore, please do not submit any
bug
reports to the Linux kernel mailing list unless you can reproduce them
without having this module loaded."

 As for using the term "tainted" in the warning: I do not like it,
because it has a absolutely negative meaning if translated into German
and maybe (likely?) other languanges. This could give the impression
that the warning tries to tell the user that non-compatibly licensed
modules are [the source of all] evil. Some of them may be evil, but I do
not buy this concept in general.

Martin
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Knoblauch         |    email:  Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de
TeraPort GmbH            |    Phone:  +49-89-510857-309
C+ITS                    |    Fax:    +49-89-510857-111
http://www.teraport.de   |    Mobile: +49-170-4904759

             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-30  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-30  8:36 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-02  7:35 The tainted message Martin Knoblauch
2002-05-02 11:55 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-02 13:08   ` Martin Knoblauch
2002-04-27  4:51 Richard Thrapp
2002-04-27  7:50 ` arjan
2002-04-27  8:06 ` Enrico Demarin
2002-04-27 18:45   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-27 12:08 ` Francois Romieu
2002-04-27 15:51   ` Richard Thrapp
2002-04-28  0:33     ` Keith Owens
2002-04-27 15:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-04-27 14:27   ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-27 18:41     ` Alan Cox
2002-04-27 16:03   ` Richard Thrapp
2002-04-27 16:28   ` Bob_Tracy
2002-04-27 16:57   ` Robert Love
2002-04-29 16:59     ` Brian Beattie
2002-04-29 17:15       ` tomas szepe
2002-04-29 17:43         ` Ian Molton
2002-04-29 17:41           ` Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher
2002-04-29 18:16             ` Ian Molton
2002-04-29 18:14               ` tomas szepe
2002-04-29 17:42           ` tomas szepe
2002-04-29 19:11             ` John Alvord
2002-04-29 19:21               ` tomas szepe
2002-04-29 18:41                 ` Sandy Harris
2002-04-29 20:00                   ` tomas szepe
2002-04-29 23:06                 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-29 23:53                   ` tomas szepe
2002-04-30 13:37                   ` john slee
2002-04-30 13:44                     ` Keith Owens
2002-04-29 18:14           ` Christian Bornträger
2002-04-29 17:34             ` Sandy Harris
2002-04-27 19:22   ` Chris Abbey
2002-04-27 19:50     ` Alan Cox
2002-04-28  0:27   ` Keith Owens
2002-04-28  1:27     ` Richard Thrapp
2002-04-28  1:41       ` Keith Owens
2002-04-28  2:14         ` Richard Thrapp
2002-04-28  2:00       ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CCE577A.DD3D83FE@TeraPort.de \
    --to=martin.knoblauch@teraport.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.knoblauch@TeraPort.de \
    --cc=pashley@storm.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox