From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 04:13:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 04:13:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.43]:50383 "EHLO smtp-server6.tampabay.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 May 2002 04:13:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3CCFA3BD.664EE747@cfl.rr.com> Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 04:13:49 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.16-lcrs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: conman@kolivas.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Combined low latency & performance patches for 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: <20020429142443.A62481333@pc.kolivas.net> <3CCD7A07.D661110E@compro.net> <20020430230105.D5CA01A0AA@pc.kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:51, you wrote: > > After applying it, if you ever do a make mrproper oldconfig dep bzImage it > > fails to compile sched.c as follows > > > If I don't do an mrproper it compiles ok. Haven't tested yet. > > Hmm > I used a make mrproper && make clean followed by manual configuration without > any problems but thanks for your input. I'm not claiming to be a patch or > kernel guru. Just offering what worked for me. > > > It's the O1 sched patch. Not your fault.... > > Thanks thats kinda reassuring :) > > Con. > I take that back. It's the low-latency patch. You must have said no to it in your .config. I do not think all these patches play well together with the O(1) -- Mark Hounschell dmarkh@cfl.rr.com