From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:47:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:47:25 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:45324 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 May 2002 09:47:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD134B6.6090504@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:44:38 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones CC: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List , dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.7 In-Reply-To: <3CD0FC0E.5020108@evision-ventures.com> <20020502152237.H16935@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Dave Jones napisa?: > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:42:54AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > - struct request *current_request; > > + struct request *req; > > unsigned int res = 0; > > struct mtd_info *mtd; > > This gratuitous change makes life a lot more irritating when bring > forward fixes from 2.4. They now need an extra pass to go through > and munge all the varnames. Or are you proposing the same change > for 2.4 ? > No I was consciuous: I just saw some macro preprocessing clashes.