From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 20:56:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 20:56:47 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:29450 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 20:56:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD4748D.30301@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 01:53:49 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Schmielau CC: Andreas Dilger , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.13 IDE 50 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Tim Schmielau napisa?: >>- Fix wrong usage of time_after in ide.c. This should cure the drive >>seek >> timeout problems some people where expierencing. This was clarified >>to me by >> Bartek, who apparently checked whatever the actual code is consistent >>with the comments in front of it. Thank you Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz. >> >> I think now that we should have time_past(xxx) in . > > > What would you suppose time_past(xxx) to do? Taking only a single parameter and telling whatever jiffies is bigger then it. Just that. Becouse if you grep for time_after or time_before you would realize immediately that nearly all of them take the variable jiffies as parameter.