From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:11:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:11:17 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:3086 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD549FC.4040406@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 17:04:28 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz CC: Neil Conway , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH, IDE corruption, 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz napisa?: >>Explanation: some code now differs in the code path concerned, and >>ide_register_subdriver now only calls ide_dma_check for UDMA drives >>(previously all DMA drives), but ultimately ide_dma_check still ends up >>in ide_config_drive_speed, and that's still fuctionally the same as >>2.4. > > > You've got been mistaken by unfortunate name (Martin changed > name dmaproc() to udma() in 2.5.12). > Code calls ide_dma_check for chipsets which registerered udma() > handler (formerly dmaproc()), I think the same 2.4 does. > > btw. udma() name is really misleading, > it should be read (u)dma() not udma() :) It's just an intermediate step before this whole crap get's trown over ;-).