From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
khttpd-users@alt.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:21:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CD6BBB3.CEB0BC8@kegel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061608300.26867-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Perhaps it's about time to talk about pulling Tux into the main kernel
> tree, as khttpd once again has proved ususable.
Hang on a minute -- I posted a patch that makes khttpd usable
again, I think...
- Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-06 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-06 0:28 khttpd rotten? Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 2:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-06 2:39 ` Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 10:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-06 11:28 ` [PATCH] " Dan Kegel
2002-05-06 17:23 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-09 9:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 10:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-09 13:04 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-11 0:13 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-05-06 14:17 ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-05-06 16:08 ` Andy Carlson
2002-05-06 23:35 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-05-07 14:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 15:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-07 15:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-07 16:02 ` Luigi Genoni
2002-05-06 17:21 ` Dan Kegel [this message]
2002-05-06 18:42 ` John Stoffel
2002-05-06 19:07 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-06 19:18 ` Cort Dougan
2002-05-06 20:47 ` Michael Rothwell
2002-05-09 11:20 ` Appications in kernelspace (was:Tux in main kernel tree?) Anders Peter Fugmann
2002-05-06 21:52 ` Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?) Paul Jakma
2002-05-09 11:28 ` john slee
2002-05-07 3:00 ` J Sloan
2002-05-09 11:40 ` khttpd rotten? john slee
2002-05-09 11:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:30 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-09 19:35 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 19:39 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-10 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-10 10:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-09 20:12 ` Ian Molton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CD6BBB3.CEB0BC8@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=khttpd-users@alt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roy@karlsbakk.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox