From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314598AbSEFRS7>; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:18:59 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314600AbSEFRS6>; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:18:58 -0400
Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:11782 "HELO relay.pair.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S314598AbSEFRS6>;
	Mon, 6 May 2002 13:18:58 -0400
X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.75.99
Message-ID: <3CD6BBB3.CEB0BC8@kegel.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:21:55 -0700
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
Reply-To: dank@kegel.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, khttpd-users@alt.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061608300.26867-100000@mustard.heime.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Perhaps it's about time to talk about pulling Tux into the main kernel
> tree, as khttpd once again has proved ususable.

Hang on a minute -- I posted a patch that makes khttpd usable
again, I think...
- Dan