From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315286AbSEGDBC>; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:01:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315291AbSEGDBB>; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:01:01 -0400
Received: from flrtn-4-m1-42.vnnyca.adelphia.net ([24.55.69.42]:37775 "EHLO
	jyro.mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S315286AbSEGDBA>;
	Mon, 6 May 2002 23:01:00 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD7436B.4060405@tmsusa.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 20:00:59 -0700
From: J Sloan <joe@tmsusa.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020505
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com>
CC: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tux in main kernel tree? (was khttpd rotten?)
In-Reply-To: <3CD5ECEE.E6C0B894@kegel.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0205061608300.26867-100000@mustard.heime.net> <15574.52864.321544.44124@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

John Stoffel wrote:

>Or maybe we should include kDNS and kftpd as well now?
>

We do have knfsd -

and FWIW, tux does ftp as well as http -

></sarcasm>
>
>An httpd server is a *user space* issue, not a kernel issue.
>
What about nfs? also a user space issue?

If a userspace httpd could come anywhere near
the performance of tux, your protest might be
just a little more beleivable.

google "specweb champ" for a gentle heads-up
on the subject.

Joe