From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:44:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:44:07 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:63496 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:43:35 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD7AF2D.7010104@evision-ventures.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 12:40:45 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 55 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Roman Zippel napisa?: > Hi, > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > >>>Another thing: where is the equivalilent part of this removed code? >> >>Look closer it's there in ide-probe.c. > > > Does it still take the correct byte swapping into account? > Did you consider using a table for the fixup? It's nothing perfomance > critical and this might generate more compact code. Well right now we have two different reimplementation of get device id code, so this areas is subject to change anyway. BTW.> It should indeed take both in to account as far as I can see.(Despite the fact that I could affort an ATARI I hardly can find one...)