From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:21:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:21:53 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:38665 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:21:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD7B826.7000000@evision-ventures.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:19:02 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.14 IDE 55 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Roman Zippel napisa?: > Hi, > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > >>>>Then ide-pci.c is still compiled into the kernel. Why? >>> >>>Becouse the big tables there are subject to go. >> >>And at some point in time it will check whatever there is >>request for any host chip support. > > > Could you please then do the above change _after_ you have done this? Well one question renames: Please name me one PCI based architecture which contains IDE support and does not contain any special host chip attached to the very same PCI bus as well.