From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:28:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:28:08 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:64268 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD7D5AA.3000708@evision-ventures.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 15:24:58 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.13 IDE 54 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Alan Cox napisa?: >>The comment above udma_enable seems to indicate that you think it >>should be ifdef'd per-architecture. That won't work for us (besides >>being ugly), because we can have two ATA host adaptors in the one >>machine that need to be programmed quite differently. Consider for >>instance a powermac with the built-in IDE interface (which would use >>the ide-pmac.c code) and a plug-in PCI IDE card, for which the >>udma_enable code is presumably correct. > > > The same will be true for the PC very soon. In fact in a few cases > it already is I have already virtualized this method in my tree :-).