From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:06:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:06:17 -0400 Received: from [203.197.145.76] ([203.197.145.76]:62219 "EHLO mailnpd.hcltech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:06:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3CD959E4.A2B93D37@npd.hcltech.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 22:31:24 +0530 From: Kaushik Datta Organization: HCL technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Abort handler ! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello , I have a pseudo HBA LLD with the assicoated functions as in the SCSI HOST Template .Now we have a situation when the abort handler of the LLD is getting (eh_abort_handler) called early than we would desire it to be called !! Is there any way by which I can increase the delay after which the abort handler of our pseudo HBA LLD will be called by the mid level ?? Thanks, Kaushik