Re: discontiguous memory platforms

Daniel Phillips
2002-05-02T18:00:43Z

On Thursday 02 May 2002 19:56, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is a good place to try out a hash table variant of
> > config_nonlinear. It's got to be more efficient than searching all the
> > nodes, don't you think?
>
> Most of the time there are only a few nodes, I just don't know where and
> how big they are, so I don't think a hash based approach will be a lot
> faster. When I'm going to change this, I'd rather try the dynamic table
> approach.

Which dynamic table approach is that?

--
Daniel