From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin@dalecki.de, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 2TB block device limit
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 21:05:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDB4711.1A4FFDAC@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15579.16423.930012.986750@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au>
Peter Chubb wrote:
>
> Hi,
> At present, linux is limited to 2TB filesystems even on 64-bit
> systems, because there are various places where the block offset on
> disc are assigned to unsigned or int 32-bit variables.
>
> There's a type, sector_t, that's meant to hold offsets in sectors and
> blocks. It's not used consistently (yet).
>
> The patch at
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/patches/2.5.14-largefile-patch
>
> ...
>
> As this touches lots of places -- the generic block layer (Andrew?)
> the IDE code (Martin?) and RAID (Neil?) and minor changes to the scsi
> I've CCd a few people directly.
That would be more Jens and aviro than I.
My vote would be: just merge the sucker while it still (almost)
applies. 2TB is a showstopper for some people in 2.4 today. Obviously
2.6 will need 64-bit block numbers.
The next obstacle will be page cache indices into the blockdev mapping.
That's either an 8TB or 16TB limit, depending on signedness correctness.
One minor point - it is currently not possible to print sector_t's.
This code:
printk("%lu%s", some_sector, some_string);
will work fine with 32-bit sector_t. But with 64-bit sector_t it
will generate a warning at compile-time and an oops at runtime.
The same problem applies to dma_addr_t. Jeff, davem and I kicked
that around a while back and ended up deciding that although there
are a number of high-tech solutions, the dumb one was best:
--- 2.5.14/include/linux/types.h~sector_t-printing Thu May 9 17:08:13 2002
+++ 2.5.14-akpm/include/linux/types.h Thu May 9 17:08:13 2002
@@ -120,8 +120,10 @@ typedef __s64 int64_t;
#ifdef BLK_64BIT_SECTOR
typedef u64 sector_t;
+#define FMT_SECTOR_T "%Lu"
#else
typedef unsigned long sector_t;
+#define FMT_SECTOR_T "%lu"
#endif
#endif /* __KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES */
--- 2.5.14/fs/buffer.c~sector_t-printing Thu May 9 17:08:13 2002
+++ 2.5.14-akpm/fs/buffer.c Thu May 9 17:09:35 2002
@@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ __clear_page_buffers(struct page *page)
static void buffer_io_error(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
- printk(KERN_ERR "Buffer I/O error on device %s, logical block %ld\n",
+ printk(KERN_ERR "Buffer I/O error on device %s,"
+ " logical block " FMT_SECTOR_T "\n",
bdevname(bh->b_bdev), bh->b_blocknr);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-10 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-10 3:36 [PATCH] remove 2TB block device limit Peter Chubb
2002-05-10 4:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-05-10 8:43 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-10 9:04 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-16 19:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-10 9:05 ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-10 9:53 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-10 10:01 ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-10 11:43 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-10 4:51 ` Martin Dalecki
[not found] ` <20020510084713.43ce396e.jeremy@kerneltrap.org>
2002-05-10 19:12 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-10 23:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-11 0:07 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-15 22:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-16 20:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-16 22:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-17 1:17 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-11 4:40 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-15 13:49 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-11 18:13 ` Padraig Brady
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-10 3:53 Neil Brown
[not found] <1060250300@toto.iv>
2002-05-13 10:28 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-13 12:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-14 0:30 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-14 1:36 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-16 20:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-14 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-14 2:58 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-14 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-14 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-05-15 9:41 Hirotaka Sasaki
2002-05-15 21:49 ` Steve Lord
[not found] <581856778@toto.iv>
2002-05-17 0:04 ` Peter Chubb
2002-05-17 0:18 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-17 13:32 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-05-17 18:02 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-17 18:26 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-05-17 18:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-05-17 19:52 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-05-17 20:25 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 15:26 ` Jason L Tibbitts III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CDB4711.1A4FFDAC@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@dalecki.de \
--cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
--cc=peter@chubb.wattle.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox