From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 04:24:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 04:24:33 -0400 Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.41]:21138 "EHLO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 04:24:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3CDCD708.6000208@notnowlewis.co.uk> Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 09:32:08 +0100 From: mikeH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020502 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Steffl CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lost interrupt hell - Plea for Help In-Reply-To: <200205101112.g4ABCoX29098@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <3CDC3B90.AADE1835@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org You can try compiling without VIA chipset support, but it makes no difference. Now, with the latest prepatches, -ac patches and ide patches, I am getting spurious "8259A interrupt: IRQ7." all over the place too. Seems like the linux kernel does not play well with AMD Cpus + VIA chipsets, which is a real shame as thats what all my machines are :( mikeH Erik Steffl wrote: > this is with stable kernel (I tried 2.4.17 and 2.4.18), via config >option compiled in (I haven't tried without via support in kernel yet, >I'll try that). > > any ideas? TIA > > erik >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > >