From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:52:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:52:46 -0400 Received: from 60.54.252.64.snet.net ([64.252.54.60]:11895 "EHLO hotmale.boyland.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3CDD3034.5010808@blue-labs.org> Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:52:36 -0400 From: David Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020501 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wayne.Brown@altec.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [OT] Re: Confidential Proposal In-Reply-To: <86256BB5.004DEF7D.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A lot of innocents would die due to the eh...(searches for polite word), "skilled" spam tracers. David Wayne.Brown@altec.com wrote: >It's too bad SpamCop doesn't offer an ICBM-targeting option for spam reports. >I'd use it in a heartbeat. > > >