From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:38:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:38:27 -0400 Received: from hermine.idb.hist.no ([158.38.50.15]:1809 "HELO hermine.idb.hist.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 13 May 2002 05:38:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3CDF9760.FF53DDF7@aitel.hist.no> Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:37:20 +0200 From: Helge Hafting X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [no] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.12-dj1 i686) X-Accept-Language: no, en, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Changelogs on kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020512010709.7a973fac.spyro@armlinux.org> <873cwx2hi4.fsf@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> <3CDF4AAE.1020605@mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > (speaking more to the crowd...) > Changeset comments need to be written as if they stand alone, without > any other context -- including the author. A reader should not need to > know that (for examples) James Simmons hacks on fbdev stuff. I think it is nice to have the names. A new kernel might break something, It is then nice to know where to send the bug report. (It is usually, but not necessarily the maintainer that did it.) That's why I like a long format, merely with the _duplicated_ names removed. I guess people like to see their name in the changelog too. :-) Helge Hafting