From: Jordan Breeding <jordan.breeding@attbi.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Status of nmi_watchdog on AMD SMP systems
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 02:55:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE0C2EA.2090107@attbi.com> (raw)
Hello,
I have a dual AMD SMP system, until recently I only had two real
problems with it, rebooting and not getting the nmi_watchdog to work at
all. I have finally figured out that using "reboot=warm" as a kernel
parameter solves the problem of rebooting not working. I have still yet
to figure out why the nmi_watdog will not work when nmi_watchdog=1 is
set. Here is a relevant section of my dmesg:
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au)
mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000, vendor = 2
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 256K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
CPU0: AMD Athlon(tm) MP 1900+ stepping 02
per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 731.57 usecs.
task migration cache decay timeout: 10 msecs.
enabled ExtINT on CPU#0
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Booting processor 1/0 eip 3000
Initializing CPU#1
masked ExtINT on CPU#1
ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000
ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000
Calibrating delay loop... 3185.04 BogoMIPS
CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000, vendor = 2
CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: L2 Cache: 256K (64 bytes/line)
CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
CPU: After generic, caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
CPU: Common caps: 0383fbff c1cbfbff 00000000 00000000
CPU1: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor stepping 02
Total of 2 processors activated (6363.54 BogoMIPS).
ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
Setting 2 in the phys_id_present_map
...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok.
init IO_APIC IRQs
IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-0, 2-5, 2-7, 2-10, 2-11, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23
not connected.
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0
activating NMI Watchdog ... done.
testing NMI watchdog ... CPU#0: NMI appears to be stuck!
number of MP IRQ sources: 19.
number of IO-APIC #2 registers: 24.
testing the IO APIC.......................
I booted that instance of linux using "nmi_watchdog=1" as a kernel
parameter and here is what my /proc/interrupts looks like:
CPU0 CPU1
0: 179006 178070 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 3 20 IO-APIC-edge i8042
2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge acpi
14: 36571 36768 IO-APIC-edge ide0
16: 77386 80349 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx, EMU10K1
17: 8 8 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx
18: 947537 948208 IO-APIC-level eth0
19: 15906 16397 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 356981 356995
ERR: 0
MIS: 0
Any ideas as to what would cause the nmi_watchdog to not set itself up
and work properly? Thanks.
Jordan Breeding
reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE0C2EA.2090107@attbi.com \
--to=jordan.breeding@attbi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox