From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:54:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:54:24 -0400 Received: from cpe-66-1-218-52.fl.sprintbbd.net ([66.1.218.52]:23054 "EHLO daytona.compro.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 09:54:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3CE11705.35E1FFC5@compro.net> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 09:54:13 -0400 From: Mark Hounschell Reply-To: markh@compro.net Organization: Compro Computer Svcs. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-lcrs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: conman@kolivas.net CC: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Combined low latency & performance patches for 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: <20020429142443.A62481333@pc.kolivas.net> <20020430230105.D5CA01A0AA@pc.kolivas.net> <3CCFA3BD.664EE747@cfl.rr.com> <200205142343.10555.conman@kolivas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark (and lkml readers) > > On further testing from the feedback I've gotten it seems that this patch > works fine for gcc 2.95.3 and gcc 3.0.3+ > > There is definitely a problem with trying to compile it with gcc2.96 >>As you can see, the low latency is enabled. I didn't see any point in >>enabling sysctl so I havent tried that. Perhaps that is it? The other thing >>is, I don't believe it works well with SMP which I am not using. I'm using 2.95.3 but also SMP. Maybe thats it.. Regards Mark