From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 14:51:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 14:51:53 -0400 Received: from daimi.au.dk ([130.225.16.1]:852 "EHLO daimi.au.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 May 2002 14:51:52 -0400 Message-ID: <3CE15CC4.3F2BBEB5@daimi.au.dk> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:51:48 +0200 From: Kasper Dupont Organization: daimi.au.dk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9-31smp i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [RFC] ext2 and ext3 block reservations can be bypassed In-Reply-To: <200205131709.g4DH9Fjv006328@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> <20020513105250.A30395@eskimo.com> <20020513185723.A2657@infradead.org> <20020514092254.A2581@eskimo.com> <20020514125536.B22935@mark.mielke.cc> <20020514104753.A3070@eskimo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Elladan wrote: > > it's ext[23] only and not really very useful. I actually find it very useful, but I cannot argue against the fact that it is an ext[23] specific feature. I might like to implement a similar feature in a filesystem independend way. The documentation about quotas says it is also ext2 specific. Is that still true? And has anybody BTW verified that the quota system doesn't suffer from the same problems? -- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet. For sending spam use mailto:razor-report@daimi.au.dk