From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug with shared memory.
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 12:33:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE16683.29A888F8@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF6D316E56.12B1A4B0-ONC1256BB9.004B5DB0@de.ibm.com>
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we managed to hang the kernel with a db/2 stress test on s/390. The test
> was done on 2.4.7 but the problem is present on all recent 2.4.x and 2.5.x
> kernels (all architectures). In short a schedule is done while holding
> the shm_lock of a shared memory segment. The system call that caused
> this has been sys_ipc with IPC_RMID and from there the call chain is
> as follows: sys_shmctl, shm_destroy, fput, dput, iput, truncate_inode_pages,
> truncate_list_pages, schedule. The scheduler picked a process that called
> sys_shmat. It tries to get the lock and hangs.
There's no way the kernel can successfully hold a spinlock
across that call chain.
> One way to fix this is to remove the schedule call from truncate_list_pages:
>
> --- linux-2.5/mm/filemap.c~ Tue May 14 17:04:14 2002
> +++ linux-2.5/mm/filemap.c Tue May 14 17:04:33 2002
> @@ -237,11 +237,6 @@
>
> page_cache_release(page);
>
> - if (need_resched()) {
> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> - schedule();
> - }
> -
> write_lock(&mapping->page_lock);
> goto restart;
> }
>
> Another way is to free the lock before calling fput in shm_destroy but the
> comment says that this functions has to be called with shp and shm_ids.sem
> locked. Comments?
Maybe ipc_ids.ary should become a semaphore?
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 15:13 Bug with shared memory Martin Schwidefsky
2002-05-14 19:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-05-15 22:42 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-15 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 17:53 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-17 20:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2002-05-17 20:29 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-05-20 4:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-20 5:21 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-20 11:34 ` Andrey Savochkin
2002-05-20 14:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-20 19:24 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-20 23:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-21 0:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-21 1:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-20 16:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-20 19:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-20 20:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-20 16:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-20 16:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-20 17:23 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-20 17:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-24 7:33 ` inode highmem imbalance fix [Re: Bug with shared memory.] Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 7:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-24 8:04 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-24 15:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-24 11:47 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-05-30 11:25 ` Denis Lunev
2002-05-30 17:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE16683.29A888F8@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox