public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Conway <nconway.list@ukaea.org.uk>
To: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.15 IDE 61
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:44:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE24A34.CEA0CAE0@ukaea.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E177dYp-00083c-00@the-village.bc.nu> <5.1.0.14.2.20020514202811.01fcc1d0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <3CE22B2B.5080506@evision-ventures.com>

Martin Dalecki wrote:
> The only problem is that having a shared lock between two queues apparently
> doesn't imply that the queues are behaving atomic on the request level
> among each others.

Correct - both queues can be active with I/O in flight at the same
time.  But think about it: if this weren't the case, then the older
kernels (using global io_request_lock) would have had to serialize ALL
I/O, one request-queue active at a time, for every single
block-device...

> Apparenty the "sublimation" of the hwgroup and overall cleanup of
> data structures, just made many people awake and be aware of problems which
> where there already for a very very long time...

I'm not quite sure which problems you mean.  The busy flag prevents any
clash. (But sure, if you change to per-device queues AND you ditch the
busy flag you're screwed.) Where is the problem?

cheers
Neil

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-15 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-14  9:49 [PATCH] 2.5.15 IDE 61 Neil Conway
2002-05-14  8:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 10:12   ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14  9:30     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 11:10       ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 10:21         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 11:38           ` Russell King
2002-05-14 10:49             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 12:10             ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 11:11               ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 12:47                 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 12:30                   ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-15 14:43                 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-14 12:00               ` Russell King
2002-05-14 11:03                 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 13:03               ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 13:27                 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-05-14 14:45                 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 14:30                   ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 16:20                     ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 16:32                       ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-14 16:47                         ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 16:51                           ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-15 11:37                             ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 22:51                           ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-14 16:26                     ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-14 19:34                     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-15  6:16                       ` Jens Axboe
2002-05-15  8:32                         ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-05-15  9:42                           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-15  9:32                       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-15 11:44                         ` Neil Conway [this message]
2002-05-15 11:02                           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-15 13:10                             ` Alan Cox
2002-05-15 13:34                               ` Neil Conway
2002-05-15 13:04                                 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-15 14:08                               ` benh
2002-05-15 16:40                         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-15 11:55                           ` Neil Conway
2002-05-17  7:07                             ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-17 11:06                               ` Neil Conway
2002-05-17 10:12                                 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 16:03                   ` Neil Conway
2002-05-14 16:46                     ` Alan Cox
2002-05-14 12:52       ` Daniela Engert
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-06  3:53 Linux-2.5.14 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-13  9:48 ` [PATCH] 2.5.15 IDE 61 Martin Dalecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CE24A34.CEA0CAE0@ukaea.org.uk \
    --to=nconway.list@ukaea.org.uk \
    --cc=aia21@cantab.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox