From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 17:10:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 17:10:24 -0400 Received: from 212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.35.44.212]:24971 "EHLO DervishD.pleyades.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 17:10:23 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 23:15:27 +0200 Organization: Pleyades To: Wayne.Brown@altec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-ID: <3CE6C46F.mailHN1RYDOH@viadomus.com> In-Reply-To: <86256BBD.00606F38.00@smtpnotes.altec.com> User-Agent: nail 9.29 12/10/01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: DervishD Reply-To: DervishD X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Wayne :) >I don't need the new kbuild. I don't want the new kbuild. But I'm >going to be stuck with it, and there's nothing I can do to stop it. >So for those of you who DO want it, why is it such a burden to hear >that not everyone thinks the way you do? Independently of my opinion about the subject, you have send a polite and very sensible answer to all the attacks you have received (some of them very out of common sense, I must say...). Congratulations for your message. I was thinking that people are more concerned of defending decisions that to really make improvementes... Just look at the messages last week: many people took a big effort to attack you verbally, but my patch to a nasty (but maybe harmless) but have totally gone ignored... Keep on like that, Wayne ;) Raśl