From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:36:16 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:53005 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:36:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3CEB8FEC.5000702@evision-ventures.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:32:44 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Russell King , "David S. Miller" , paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Alan Cox napisa?: >>I'm waiting on Phil Blundell to notice - I think /dev/port may get used >>on ARM to emulate inb() and outb() from userspace; I don't look after >>glibc so shrug. >> >>I agree however that /dev/port is a rotten interface that needs to go. > > > The /dev/port interface is used by various apps and its a traditional > x86 in paticular unix thing. For platforms like ARM its poorly implemented Erm... unix thing? I see it only in Linux... BTW. Just recently someone has found out that it is indeed *poorly* implemented. > since it ought to turn into a fraction of /dev/mem and support mmap for > speedier user space in/out emulation..