From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:39:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:39:43 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:17934 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 09:39:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3CEB90C5.2000609@evision-ventures.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:36:21 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: jack@suse.cz, Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux-2.5.17 In-Reply-To: <3CEB78D7.7070107@evision-ventures.com> <20020522131441.C16934@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Russell King napisa?: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:54:15PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote: > >>Please put the following crap under /proc/sys/fs, >>where it belongs. OK? > > > /proc/sys is for sysctls, not random proc junk. Therefore, putting the > random crap you point out that's currently in /proc/fs in /proc/sys/fs: > > >>[root@kozaczek fs]# pwd >>/proc/fs >>[root@kozaczek fs]# cat quota >>Version 60501 >>Formats >>0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 >>[root@kozaczek fs]# > > > is even worse. > > /proc/sys has a clean and clear purpose. sysctl is for adjusting global system parameters. So apparently it's even worser, becouse the above doesn't even serve this purpose? I tought 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 where random configuration parameters.