From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 13:43:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 13:43:38 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:44818 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 May 2002 13:43:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3CEBC9EE.2090701@evision-ventures.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:40:14 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020419 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini CC: Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 IDE 67 In-Reply-To: <3CEB466B.3090604@evision-ventures.com> <20020522171329.GG1209@opus.bloom.county> <3CEBC576.4060703@evision-ventures.com> <20020522173137.GH1209@opus.bloom.county> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Uz.ytkownik Tom Rini napisa?: > > And when the PPC4xx drivers are ready to be submitted we'll need to add > in __powerpc__ tests too. Can't we just keep CONFIG_DMA_NONPCI for now? > Plese feel free to add them when and where they are needed. It's no problem to clean this all up then again if a true usage pattern emerges. And I have no problem with patches toching "core" driver stuff as long as the changes are justified I will integrate them with pleasure at time. In the time between I tend to code for reality and not for vapour (no offence intendid...) :-).