From: J Sloan <jjs@lexus.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:14:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CEC1828.5050209@lexus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17AakK-0002UE-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox wrote:
>>Huh? RH 7.3 kernel has the O(1) scheduler merged?
>>
>>If the RH kernel is anything like the 2.4.19-pre8-ac5
>>I'm currently running, that is sweet indeed.
>>
>>
>
>rpm -q --changelog |grep "O(1)"
>
>
>
Yes, I was being lazy - but now that finals
are done with for now, I'll grab that kernel
source rpm and have a proper look at it.
Thanks,
Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-22 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-22 6:51 2.4.19pre*: IO statistics in /proc/partitions corrupt Jochen Suckfuell
2002-05-22 14:00 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? M. Edward Borasky
2002-05-22 14:08 ` bert hubert
2002-05-22 14:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:56 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 21:46 ` Doug Ledford
2002-05-22 14:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 15:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 15:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 16:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 18:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:02 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-22 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:34 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 20:30 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 21:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 22:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 22:44 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-28 2:08 ` Wim Coekaerts
2002-05-31 20:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-23 14:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:34 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:38 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:50 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:54 ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:22 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 22:14 ` J Sloan [this message]
2002-05-22 18:24 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 22:05 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-22 14:29 Alastair Stevens
2002-05-22 14:52 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CEC1828.5050209@lexus.com \
--to=jjs@lexus.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox