From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:11:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:11:09 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20]:64552 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:11:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3CED068A.870BC1D8@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 17:11:06 +0200 From: Gunther Mayer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Linux-usb-users] Re: What to do with all of the USB UHCI driversin the kernel? In-Reply-To: <3CECFBEE.9010802@evision-ventures.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Dalecki wrote: > Uz.ytkownik Stephen J. Gowdy napisa?: > > Hi Martin, > > What do you actually want to know? That an EHCI controller should > > use the ehci-hcd driver and that the OHCI controller should use the > > ohci-hcd controller? Or that the uhci-* drivers can't drive a EHCI or OHCI > > controller? Or something else? > Rename the old driver to *-old. Rename the new drivers to the "normal" names. There is no reason to confurce the userbase to fiddle with their configurations. You said the old drivers could seamlessly be replacedby s.th. better, so this policy will implement this at it's best. You will immediately get a lot of testing !!! Regards, Gunther