From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 17:45:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 17:45:34 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:30993 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 17:45:34 -0400 Message-ID: <3CF15838.FE768070@zip.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 14:48:40 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Peter J. Braam" CC: Linus Torvalds , lkml , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [patch 11/18] dirsync In-Reply-To: <3CF14973.B61EF771@zip.com.au> <20020526093637.V32110@lustre.cfs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Peter J. Braam" wrote: > > Hi > > I think this patch is actually pretty important - could we please have > this, or something like this? > Well `-o sync' will give the same result. dirsync is just a speedup. I should have mentioned: untarring a kernel tree with dirsync is 4x to 5x faster than `-o sync', but still tons slower (5x?) than default.