From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:34:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:34:21 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:43013 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:34:19 -0400 Message-ID: <3CF2A648.1070303@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 14:34:00 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin LaHaise CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x In-Reply-To: <3CF23893.207@loewe-komp.de> <1022513156.1126.289.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020527173306.C15560@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>Well, if you can't fork a new process because that would push you into >>overcommit, then you usually can't actually do anything useful on the >>machine. > > > Just use vfork or clone + exec. It's faster and uses less memory. > Doesn't help. exec() should fail. -hpa