* Use of CONFIG_M686
@ 2002-05-27 22:22 J.A. Magallon
2002-05-27 22:29 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-27 22:38 ` Brian Gerst
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: J.A. Magallon @ 2002-05-27 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lista Linux-Kernel
Hi all...
Grepping through the sources or the kernel in search of CONFIG_M686
occurences, there are some places where it looks like that flag is
used as 'Anything bigger than a Pentium'. Now kernel has configs
for PIII, P4, probably PII.
It is the f00f bug handling. Files:
arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:
#ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== which also passes if PII, P4...
void __init trap_init_f00f_bug(void)
...
arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:
static void __init init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== again
static int f00f_workaround_enabled = 0;
...
So thats why I asked if we could use a CONFIG_MPENTIUMPRO, and make
CONFIG_M686 a generic flag that is also defined for anything bigger
than a Pentium (that looks like the current usage).
So:
Pentium -> M586
PPro -> MPENTIUMPRO M686
PII -> MPENTIUMII M686
PIII -> MPENTIUMIII M686
P4 -> MPENTIUM4 M686
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam4 #2 SMP dom may 26 11:20:42 CEST 2002 i686
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use of CONFIG_M686
2002-05-27 22:22 Use of CONFIG_M686 J.A. Magallon
@ 2002-05-27 22:29 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-28 0:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-27 22:38 ` Brian Gerst
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: J.A. Magallon @ 2002-05-27 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lista Linux-Kernel
On 2002.05.28 J.A. Magallon wrote:
>Hi all...
>
>arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:
>
>#ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== which also passes if PII, P4...
>void __init trap_init_f00f_bug(void)
>...
Would it be enough with
#if defined(CONFIG_M586) || defined(CONFIG_M586TSC) || defined(CONFIG_M586MMX)
386-486 do not have the bug, do ?
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:jamagallon@able.es
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam4 #2 SMP dom may 26 11:20:42 CEST 2002 i686
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use of CONFIG_M686
2002-05-27 22:22 Use of CONFIG_M686 J.A. Magallon
2002-05-27 22:29 ` J.A. Magallon
@ 2002-05-27 22:38 ` Brian Gerst
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gerst @ 2002-05-27 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J.A. Magallon; +Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel
J.A. Magallon wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Grepping through the sources or the kernel in search of CONFIG_M686
> occurences, there are some places where it looks like that flag is
> used as 'Anything bigger than a Pentium'. Now kernel has configs
> for PIII, P4, probably PII.
>
> It is the f00f bug handling. Files:
>
> arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== which also passes if PII, P4...
> void __init trap_init_f00f_bug(void)
> ...
>
> arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:
>
> static void __init init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> #ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== again
> static int f00f_workaround_enabled = 0;
> ...
>
>
> So thats why I asked if we could use a CONFIG_MPENTIUMPRO, and make
> CONFIG_M686 a generic flag that is also defined for anything bigger
> than a Pentium (that looks like the current usage).
>
> So:
> Pentium -> M586
> PPro -> MPENTIUMPRO M686
> PII -> MPENTIUMII M686
> PIII -> MPENTIUMIII M686
> P4 -> MPENTIUM4 M686
>
>
I fixed that in 2.5 by introducing CONFIG_X86_F00F_BUG.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=101416800017102&w=4
--
Brian Gerst
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use of CONFIG_M686
2002-05-27 22:29 ` J.A. Magallon
@ 2002-05-28 0:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 14:25 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-05-28 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J.A. Magallon; +Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 23:29, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> On 2002.05.28 J.A. Magallon wrote:
> >Hi all...
> >
> >arch/i386/kernel/traps.c:
> >
> >#ifndef CONFIG_M686 <=================== which also passes if PII, P4...
> >void __init trap_init_f00f_bug(void)
> >...
>
> Would it be enough with
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_M586) || defined(CONFIG_M586TSC) || defined(CONFIG_M586MMX)
>
> 386-486 do not have the bug, do ?
You misunderstand the intent. A 386 or 486 kernel will run on a Pentium
and could therefore hit the error. A PPro kernel would die earlier
anyway. Of course its long been PPRO|Athlon|... and the ifdef wanted
updating. I'd ifdef it on CONFIG_X86_FOOF_BUG and put the FOOF thing
into arch/i386/Config.in nicely with the other stuff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Use of CONFIG_M686
2002-05-28 0:05 ` Alan Cox
@ 2002-05-29 14:25 ` Dave Jones
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2002-05-29 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: J.A. Magallon, Lista Linux-Kernel
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:05:46AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> You misunderstand the intent. A 386 or 486 kernel will run on a Pentium
> and could therefore hit the error. A PPro kernel would die earlier
> anyway. Of course its long been PPRO|Athlon|... and the ifdef wanted
> updating. I'd ifdef it on CONFIG_X86_FOOF_BUG and put the FOOF thing
> into arch/i386/Config.in nicely with the other stuff
Agreed. This is what's done in 2.5 btw.
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-29 14:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-27 22:22 Use of CONFIG_M686 J.A. Magallon
2002-05-27 22:29 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-28 0:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 14:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-27 22:38 ` Brian Gerst
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox