public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:52:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CF4CF0B.7010008@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291453230.19359-100000@netfinity.realnet.co.sz>

Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
> 	Just a few comments, please don't mistake it for nitpicking, but 
> perhaps a request for clarification.

No problem at all.

> 
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 
> 
>>- Don't allow check_partition to be more clever then the writer of a driver.
>>   It was interfering with drivers which check partitions as they go and
>>   finally if we want to spew something about it - we can do it ourself.
> 
> 
> Should this really be the case? Isn't the driver the one that is 
> interfering in this case?

No please have a close look at the boot sequence of
the 2.5.18 kernel without the above patch applied.
It will:

1. Spew the "Paritition checks" message ony once directly after the
    detection of the drive /dev/hda geometry and then never again.

2. It will check the partitions twice, without the above message.

After hot plugging some device the above message should be
perhaps reintroduced, but right now it won't appear at all.

The ideal thing we should do would be:

Detect a channel, detect a disk on a channel, detect partitions on it.

Right now we where doing:
Look for disks, where there are disks, assume there is a channel too.
Look for all disks goemetries.
Look for all disks partitions.

Wuite worng in the context of  aproper support for hot
plugging stuff.

So I'm *very* confident about the above change.

>>   Anyway we grok the partitions now one by one as we detect the channels.
> 
> 
> Same as above.

What's your problem here - that's the proper thing to do.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-29 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-25  2:02 Linux-2.5.18 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-27  9:34 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 71 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-28 14:23 ` Linux-2.5.18 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-28 15:31 ` [PATCH] airo Martin Dalecki
2002-05-28 17:35 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 QUEUE_EMPTY and the unpleasant friends Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 12:11 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 12:58   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-29 12:52     ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-05-29 12:20 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 74 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 16:03 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 75 Martin Dalecki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-29 13:59 [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73 Gerald Champagne
2002-05-29 13:03 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 14:26   ` Gerald Champagne
2002-05-29 14:35   ` Russell King
2002-05-29 13:40     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 16:33   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 15:46     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 18:47       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30  8:48         ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-30 12:22           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 17:55     ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 17:01       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 16:05         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 17:05           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 18:43         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 18:07 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 21:57 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 18:16 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 23:40 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 22:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30  0:19 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-30 13:02 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:32   ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30 13:54     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:05       ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-30 15:13       ` Rene Rebe
2002-05-30 15:39       ` Wichert Akkerman
2002-05-30 16:13       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30 14:20         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:31           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-30 18:55             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:25         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-30 12:35 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-05-30 14:43 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-30 14:01 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:09   ` Rene Rebe
2002-05-31 13:25     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-30 15:56 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CF4CF0B.7010008@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox