From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list
<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.19
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 00:22:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CF554A1.4090607@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020529211702.E30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10205291331500.19493-100000@www.transvirtual.com> <20020529214739.F30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
> I'm not talking about general maintainence of the cyber2000fb driver here,
> or general "keep it working" type changes. I'm talking about a blatent
> "take the version from the rmk patch and submit it to Linus without telling
> the maintainer of the code you're buggering with" attitude here.
Dear Russell why don't you just abuse Linus as a spinlock for this kind
of synchronization its his job. No need to get angry at this.
Hey it's developement series time...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-29 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-29 18:50 Linux 2.5.19 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-29 19:42 ` Jason Lunz
2002-05-29 20:17 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 20:38 ` Eli Carter
2002-05-29 20:44 ` James Simmons
2002-05-29 20:47 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 22:22 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-05-29 23:25 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 22:42 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 23:52 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 23:00 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 22:43 ` James Simmons
2002-05-29 22:29 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 23:31 ` Russell King
2002-05-30 5:10 ` Framebuffer policy [ was Re: Linux 2.5.19] James Simmons
2002-05-29 20:37 ` [PATCH] Missing include in drivers/base/bus.c and drivers/pci/pci-driver.c Tom Rini
2002-05-29 22:24 ` Linux 2.5.19 Tom Rini
2002-05-30 1:29 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-29 23:01 ` Matthias Andree
2002-05-29 23:35 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-30 14:15 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 blk.h and more about the ugly kids Martin Dalecki
2002-05-31 11:09 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 76 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-31 18:17 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 77 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 6:04 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 78 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 8:16 ` Paul Dickson
2002-06-02 9:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-02 19:34 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 21:36 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-02 21:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-03 4:47 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 6:06 ` [PATCH} 2.5.19 IDE 79 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 6:07 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 80 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 19:45 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 81 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-02 20:13 ` [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 82 Martin Dalecki
[not found] <805239813@toto.iv>
2002-05-30 1:38 ` Linux 2.5.19 Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CF554A1.4090607@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=jsimmons@transvirtual.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox