From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:20:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:20:49 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:33290 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:20:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3CF554A1.4090607@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 00:22:25 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: James Simmons , Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.19 In-Reply-To: <20020529211702.E30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20020529214739.F30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > I'm not talking about general maintainence of the cyber2000fb driver here, > or general "keep it working" type changes. I'm talking about a blatent > "take the version from the rmk patch and submit it to Linus without telling > the maintainer of the code you're buggering with" attitude here. Dear Russell why don't you just abuse Linus as a spinlock for this kind of synchronization its his job. No need to get angry at this. Hey it's developement series time...