From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:58:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:58:32 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:55050 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:58:31 -0400 Message-ID: <3CF55D7B.80009@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 01:00:11 +0200 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020523 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: James Simmons , Kernel Mailing List , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.19 In-Reply-To: <20020529211702.E30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20020529214739.F30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <3CF554A1.4090607@evision-ventures.com> <20020530002559.G30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <3CF55941.7060806@evision-ventures.com> <20020530005207.I30585@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > If you think this is acceptable, why the hell did I bother sending those > IDE DMA changes through you? After all, you don't need to know about > them because I know better than you, don't I? *That's* what you're > advocating here, and I'm sure you're going to object to that. Well just to make my point clear. I trust you and I thing that you indeed know better then me on ARM stuff. (At least you can run it on more then my tinny PSION 5mx... where I still didn't revert to the original OS, quite cute this little thing under linux :-). But I wouldn't have minded it at all if you had just sendid the ARM adjustments directly to Linus! In the particular case we had it was however good to have some direct communication in front just to resolve the API issues. OK?