* [PATCH] missing bit from signal patches
@ 2002-05-30 0:18 Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 8:04 ` Roman Zippel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2002-05-30 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus; +Cc: Trivial Kernel Patches, LKML
Hi Linus,
The following should allow the affected architectures to build in
2.5.19 as currently there will be two definitions of
copy_siginfo_to_user.
Please apply.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#define SIGEV_PAD_SIZE ((SIGEV_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 4)
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _CRIS_SIGINFO_H
#define _CRIS_SIGINFO_H
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
+
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
#endif
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGEVENT_T
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _PARISC_SIGINFO_H
#define _PARISC_SIGINFO_H
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
+
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
/*
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:39 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:39 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.1/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h Mon May 27 00:55:05 2002
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 0:18 [PATCH] missing bit from signal patches Stephen Rothwell
@ 2002-05-30 8:04 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-30 12:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-05-30 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: LKML
Hi,
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The following should allow the affected architectures to build in
> 2.5.19 as currently there will be two definitions of
> copy_siginfo_to_user.
There are other build problems. m68k doesn't compile, because siginfo_t is
defined after the generic include and the inline functions in there access
that structure. On the other hand I can't put the include after the
definition, as it depends on other defines in the include.
I worked around it with some ugly hacks, but a proper fix would be very
welcome.
bye, Roman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 8:04 ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-05-30 12:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 12:46 ` Roman Zippel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2002-05-30 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel, Linus, Trivial Kernel Patches
Hi Roman,
On Thu, 30 May 2002 10:04:03 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > The following should allow the affected architectures to build in
> > 2.5.19 as currently there will be two definitions of
> > copy_siginfo_to_user.
>
> There are other build problems. m68k doesn't compile, because siginfo_t is
> defined after the generic include and the inline functions in there access
> that structure. On the other hand I can't put the include after the
> definition, as it depends on other defines in the include.
> I worked around it with some ugly hacks, but a proper fix would be very
> welcome.
Is the following a more ugly hack than yours?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff -ruN 2.5.19-si/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.3/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19-si/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.3/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h Thu May 30 22:04:54 2002
@@ -64,7 +64,11 @@
} _sifields;
} siginfo_t;
-#endif
+#else /* HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T */
+
+struct siginfo;
+
+#endif /* HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T */
/*
* How these fields are to be accessed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 12:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2002-05-30 12:46 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-30 13:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-05-30 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Is the following a more ugly hack than yours?
Yes. :)
The problem is copy_siginfo(), which wants to access struct siginfo.
Copy the m68k version of siginfo.h and try to compile that.
bye, Roman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 12:46 ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-05-30 13:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 14:16 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-30 19:57 ` Roman Zippel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2002-05-30 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Roman,
On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Is the following a more ugly hack than yours?
>
> Yes. :)
> The problem is copy_siginfo(), which wants to access struct siginfo.
> Copy the m68k version of siginfo.h and try to compile that.
OK, sorry, brain fart :-)
It seems that is an architecture defines its own siginfo_t then it must
also define its own copy_siginfo function (for now anyway).
Try this ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-alpha/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#define SIGEV_PAD_SIZE ((SIGEV_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 4)
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-cris/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _CRIS_SIGINFO_H
#define _CRIS_SIGINFO_H
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
+
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
#endif
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-ia64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:17:10 2002
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define _M68K_SIGINFO_H
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
@@ -68,6 +69,18 @@
#define si_uid16 _sifields._kill._uid
#else
#define si_uid _sifields._kill._uid
+
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+static inline void copy_siginfo(struct siginfo *to, struct siginfo *from)
+{
+ if (from->si_code < 0)
+ memcpy(to, from, sizeof(*to));
+ else
+ /* _sigchld is currently the largest know union member */
+ memcpy(to, from, 3*sizeof(int) + sizeof(from->_sifields._sigchld));
+}
+
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-mips/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-mips/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-mips/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-mips/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:18:46 2002
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@
#define SIGEV_PAD_SIZE ((SIGEV_MAX_SIZE/sizeof(int)) - 4)
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
-
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGEVENT_T
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
@@ -121,5 +121,20 @@
} _sigev_thread;
} _sigev_un;
} sigevent_t;
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+static inline void copy_siginfo(struct siginfo *to, struct siginfo *from)
+{
+ if (from->si_code < 0)
+ memcpy(to, from, sizeof(*to));
+ else
+ /* _sigchld is currently the largest know union member */
+ memcpy(to, from, 3*sizeof(int) + sizeof(from->_sifields._sigchld));
+}
+
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_SIGINFO_H */
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-mips64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:19:33 2002
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGEVENT_T
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
@@ -120,5 +122,20 @@
} _sigev_thread;
} _sigev_un;
} sigevent_t;
+
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+static inline void copy_siginfo(struct siginfo *to, struct siginfo *from)
+{
+ if (from->si_code < 0)
+ memcpy(to, from, sizeof(*to));
+ else
+ /* _sigchld is currently the largest know union member */
+ memcpy(to, from, 3*sizeof(int) + sizeof(from->_sifields._sigchld));
+}
+
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_SIGINFO_H */
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-parisc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
#ifndef _PARISC_SIGINFO_H
#define _PARISC_SIGINFO_H
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
+
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
/*
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:39 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-sparc/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h
--- 2.5.19/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:39 2002
+++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-sparc64/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:11:50 2002
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
+#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO_TO_USER
#include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 13:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2002-05-30 14:16 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-30 19:57 ` Roman Zippel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Wächtler @ 2002-05-30 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Roman Zippel, linux-kernel
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2002 14:46:20 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 May 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is the following a more ugly hack than yours?
>>>
>>Yes. :)
>>The problem is copy_siginfo(), which wants to access struct siginfo.
>>Copy the m68k version of siginfo.h and try to compile that.
>>
>
> OK, sorry, brain fart :-)
>
> It seems that is an architecture defines its own siginfo_t then it must
> also define its own copy_siginfo function (for now anyway).
>
> Try this ...
>
Why is that done so complicated?
Why not just copy the struct over?
When the kernel generates the signal, I hope the mem is zeroed
and we copy it to user. When a user sends a signal, you want to
prevent sending of arbitrary data? Why is that not done where
the permission check happens?
What do I miss?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 13:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 14:16 ` Peter Wächtler
@ 2002-05-30 19:57 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-31 0:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Roman Zippel @ 2002-05-30 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Try this ...
This almost works. :)
> diff -ruN 2.5.19/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h
> --- 2.5.19/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h Thu May 30 09:44:38 2002
> +++ 2.5.19-si.4/include/asm-m68k/siginfo.h Thu May 30 23:17:10 2002
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #define _M68K_SIGINFO_H
>
> #define HAVE_ARCH_SIGINFO_T
> +#define HAVE_ARCH_COPY_SIGINFO
>
> #include <asm-generic/siginfo.h>
>
> @@ -68,6 +69,18 @@
> #define si_uid16 _sifields._kill._uid
> #else
> #define si_uid _sifields._kill._uid
> +
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +
> +static inline void copy_siginfo(struct siginfo *to, struct siginfo *from)
> +{
> + if (from->si_code < 0)
> + memcpy(to, from, sizeof(*to));
> + else
> + /* _sigchld is currently the largest know union member */
> + memcpy(to, from, 3*sizeof(int) + sizeof(from->_sifields._sigchld));
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #endif
The function is in the #else part of #ifdef __KERNEL__.
bye, Roman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: missing bit from signal patches
2002-05-30 19:57 ` Roman Zippel
@ 2002-05-31 0:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2002-05-31 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roman Zippel; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Roman,
On Thu, 30 May 2002 21:57:58 +0200 Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Try this ...
>
> This almost works. :)
Just goes to show I should go to bed earlier :-)
I assume it works if you put the function definition in the right place?
I will redo the patch (looking harder this time now that I am awake)
and submit it to Linus.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-31 0:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-30 0:18 [PATCH] missing bit from signal patches Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 8:04 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-30 12:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 12:46 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-30 13:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2002-05-30 14:16 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-30 19:57 ` Roman Zippel
2002-05-31 0:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox