From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:55:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:55:07 -0400 Received: from 212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.35.44.212]:58752 "EHLO DervishD.pleyades.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 31 May 2002 15:55:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:00:41 +0200 Organization: Pleyades To: Linux-kernel Subject: Sorry, I was wrong Message-ID: <3CF7D669.mail9VB1DA5LZ@viadomus.com> User-Agent: nail 9.29 12/10/01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: DervishD Reply-To: DervishD X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Alan & Thomas :) Effectively, the SuS says that mmap never place a map at address 0 nor affect an existing mapping *except* when called with MAP_FIXED. I didn't notice that point. Alan is right then. Raśl