From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 85
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 16:00:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CFE1974.9080509@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206021853030.1383-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <3CFE0C16.1020203@evision-ventures.com> <20020605141717.GB16257@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
> AFAICS, you just introduced some nasty list races in the interrupt
> handlers. You must hold the queue locks when calling
> blkdev_dequeue_request() and end_that_request_last(), for instance.
>
No. Please be more accurate. Becouse:
1. If anything I have made existing races only "obvious".
2. It is called in the context of do_ide_request or ide_raw_taskfile
where we already have the lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 1:56 Linux 2.5.20 Linus Torvalds
2002-06-03 3:06 ` 2.5.20 -- suspend.c still breaks the build (originally reported for 2.5.18) Miles Lane
2002-06-04 14:06 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-03 3:18 ` [patch] i386 "General Options" - begone [take 2] Brad Hards
2002-06-03 22:42 ` Rusty Russell
2002-06-04 14:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 22:05 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-02 5:16 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-03 13:34 ` Oops Linux 2.5.20 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-03 14:06 ` [PATCH] 2.5.20 airo wireless - "I can't get no, compilation..." Martin Dalecki
2002-06-03 14:09 ` ]PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 83 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-04 12:07 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-04 15:30 ` [PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 84 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-05 13:03 ` [PATCH] 2.5.20 IDE 85 Martin Dalecki
2002-06-05 14:17 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-05 14:00 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-06-05 15:48 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-05 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-05 15:10 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-05 16:14 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-05 15:26 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-06-06 7:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-06-05 16:36 ` [PATCH] Cleanup i386 <linux/init.h> abuses Tom Rini
2002-06-07 11:01 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 19:19 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-07 19:26 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-05 23:22 ` [PATCH] Add <linux/kdev_t.h> to <linux/bio.h> Tom Rini
2002-06-05 23:34 ` Russell King
2002-06-05 23:42 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-06 18:33 ` [PATCH] Move vmalloc wrappers out of include/linux/vmalloc.h Tom Rini
2002-06-06 19:44 ` [PATCH] Remove <linux/mm.h> from <linux/vmalloc.h> Tom Rini
2002-06-06 21:02 ` [PATCH] More work on removing " Tom Rini
2002-06-06 21:21 ` [PATCH] Include <linux/gfp.h> directly instead of via <linux/mm.h> Tom Rini
2002-06-06 21:24 ` [PATCH] Remove numerous includes from <linux/mm.h> Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CFE1974.9080509@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox