From: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>,
Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 16:03:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CFF6BAE.8080406@loewe-komp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206051612170.2614-100000@waste.org> <E17FikY-0001fL-00@starship> <3CFF22B2.5050004@loewe-komp.de> <E17Fuy2-0002Fa-00@starship>
Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:52, Peter Wächtler wrote:
>
>>Daniel Phillips wrote:
>>
>>>Our current block queue design would benefit a lot from the kind of
>>>thinking that would be required to make it realtime.
>>>
>>You know that spinning disks do some recalibrations?
>>
>>Whatever marketing tries to imply with "realtime volumes" - the
>>technology only tries to make better promises (think of AV disks
>>for better sustained rate).
>>
>
> It's my impression that some do thermal recalibration and some don't:
>
> http://www.pctechguide.com/04disks.htm
> "recalibration"
>
>
> The need to turn in reliable performance for multimedia apps seems
> to have made thermal calibration a thing of the past, but thanks for
> raising the issue.
>
Ok, seems that I am a bit outdated (here) :-)
>
>>LynxOS (now LynuxWorks) has some patents for priority based IO.
>>
>
> Oh, more of those one-click realtime patents ;-) Do you have any
> pointers?
>
http://www.lynuxworks.com/products/whitepapers/patentedio.php3
In the upper right corner you can see the patent number. Try
a search for patent on this side.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-06 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler [this message]
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CFF6BAE.8080406@loewe-komp.de \
--to=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox