From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:39:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:39:32 -0400 Received: from 212.Red-80-35-44.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.35.44.212]:52864 "EHLO DervishD.pleyades.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:39:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:45:32 +0200 Organization: Pleyades To: aeriksson@fastmail.fm, raul@pleyades.net Subject: Re: QoS on incoming data Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3D070A2C.mail2E4114UKH@viadomus.com> In-Reply-To: <20020611205706.E3A8B470D@tippex.localdomain> User-Agent: nail 9.29 12/10/01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: DervishD Reply-To: DervishD X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Anders :) >You said way back that it was only wget that did hog the andbith, >right? Well, not exactly. Let's say that wget seems more 'aggresive', but really the one who gets all the speed is the *first* downloading program started, although some of them seems to be more friendly than others. Wget is a corner case. Lukemftp is less aggresive. I've already considered the tcp windows issue, but is not the case (IMHO). I think that's more probable the option regarding ISP large queues. Thanks for your answer and interest :)) Raśl