From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316604AbSFPWxr>; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:53:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316609AbSFPWxq>; Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:53:46 -0400
Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:1039 "HELO relay.pair.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S316604AbSFPWxq>;
	Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:53:46 -0400
X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.73.164
Message-ID: <3D0D17AA.D0D11732@kegel.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 15:56:42 -0700
From: dank@kegel.com
Reply-To: dank@kegel.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: napi backport to 2.4?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

How hard would it be to backport napi to 2.4?
There were a few rumblings about that last year...